As the inhabitant man of honor of Quill & Pad, I feel that the time is before long approaching to compose a tribute declaring the demise of the dress watch.
It isn’t that we didn’t see this coming, nor is it a disengaged occasion. Yet, it still hurts.
What was long the foundation of the watch business is not, at this point a fervently wanted model. The dress watch has been overwhelmed, outperformed, and now and again even tremendously failed to remember as new ages go overboard on steel-encased symbols, the most recent Apple watch, or do without a watch all together.
As the plunge of the watch business walks on, the dress watch, when a glad general driving the soldiers, is currently becoming the first casualty.
The dress watch itself has consistently been fairly an inconsistency, one that blossomed with exaggerating its odd take on the cold, hard truth. Albeit encased in gold – preferably yellow – it needed to look calm, have two hands (three and no more), and be dainty and mechanical just as little in diameter.
Bracelets? Apologies, they are disliked, so a dim hued cowhide lash it was: calfskin is alright, however crocodile is preferred.
The result is a shockingly basic looking watch, which remains in sharp difference to the impressive exertion and craftsmanship expected to make it, also the monetary venture needed to wear one.
Icons with anniversaries
Despite (or possibly on account of) their downplayed appearances, some dress watches haven’t gone unnoticed and have become symbols. Two of them are celebrating significant commemorations this year: the Piaget Altiplano turns 60 and the Cartier Tank praises its centennial.
While these watches are still profoundly regarded inside the very close community of watch specialists, they are not being purchased – in any event in adequate amounts – to command the noticeable position they once had.
Gold-cased watches, by and large, are undeniably less mainstream than they used to be. Steel is presently viewed as similarly honorable, bronze has acquired a dedicated after, and ceramic and carbon fiber are the following huge thing.
This has harmed particularly the watch fabricates that represent considerable authority in flawless gold dress watches like Piaget and Vacheron Constantin.
But significantly different brands appearing to do fine and dandy face difficulties when selling their dress watches.
When you say the words “Audemars Piguet,” everybody immediately thinks “Regal Oak.” Few raise the Millenary, yet the number of know about the Jules Audemars assortment, which contains a few extraordinary dress watches?
At Patek Philippe, even the strong Calatrava has been overshadowed by the continuous achievement of the Nautilus. Here the brand’s well known slogan – that you only take care of it for the future – may even fill in as a weakness as potential customers may stand by to get one of Patek Philippe’s dress watches as a legacy as opposed to buy one of their own.
Perhaps I’m putting this a piece obtusely, however why put resources into something you would possibly wear periodically if at all?
Has the dress watch floated out of fashion?
The reason for death for the dress watch is a complex one, however can generally be depicted as becoming out of sync with present day style.
Or should we say that cutting edge style has gotten more out of sync with the dress watch?
Comfortable attire reigns in many storage rooms, and occasions for which we once spruced up we currently dress down. This isn’t the air where a dress watch is at its best.
But there is one major “c” in design that places a long nail in the casket of the dress watch, and that is the c in “connected.”
Professional life was frequently where the dress watch was in its normal living space. Here innovation is dominating, and numerous experts currently prefer an Apple Watch or another associated gadget on the wrist land where once the dress watch gladly resided.
It assists experts with keeping steady over things, or if nothing else that is the thing that they tell themselves.
In this always associated world, I discover harmony in a watch with no noticeable movement as I look at it. The hands move, obviously, however I am not spooky by them as they set the tone of the futile daily existence that we make out of life. This is one more inconsistency toward the destruction of the dress watch, as a considerable lot of us need to unquestionably have accomplished some positive outcomes in that futile daily existence to have the option to stand to get one of them.
Is there any expect endurance for the dress watch?
While it’s in a coma, I question the dress watch will completely stop to exist as I anticipate that it should become a niche.
Pocket watches went down a similar street dress watches are going down now, yet they are as yet being made in more modest numbers for an appreciative gathering of committed enthusiasts.
Manufactures that presently significantly rely upon dress watches should locate another heading for their assortments as customers for their dress watches are only not as copious as they once were.
The status of the Cartier Tank and the Piaget Altiplano will guarantee somewhat that they stay underway as symbols of the industry.
That is probably some uplifting news on the grounds that as inhabitant noble man of Quill & Pad, and an enthusiastic gatherer of dress watches, this is one tribute I trust never to write.
* This article was first distributed on November 30, 2017 at The Death Of The Dress Watch: Is It Time To Write Its Obituary?
You may likewise enjoy:
The Dandy Watches Of Piaget
Vacheron Constantin’s New Historiques American 1921 Small: Transforming The Traditional Into The Modern
Patek Philippe’s Golden Ellipse: 50 Years Of Mathematics At Their Finest
60 Years Of Piaget Altiplano: Sophisticated Style Versus Fugitive Fashion