Desirable artifacts some of the time come with uncomfortable truths
On May 18, 2018, a Rolex Daytona chronograph Reference 6263 known as the Red Sultan sold at auction by Phillips for more than 1.2 million Swiss francs .
This is a recent illustration of genuine watch collectors communicating increasing interest in vintage watches (generally Rolex, and less significantly Audemars Piguet, IWC, Patek Philippe, and even Seiko) bearing either the Sultanate of Oman’s khanjar (customary Omani knife) and crossed blades seal or the mark, normally in red, of the current Sultan Qaboos canister Said Albu Saidi (قابوس) on the dial.
Increasing interest for watches with the Omani seal is justifiable given the excellent, great condition, obvious provenance, and uncommonness of a large portion of these watches, combined with the fact that they had frequently been introduced to their first proprietors during the 1970s by Sultan Qaboos face to face as a badge of appreciation for services rendered to the then nascent sultanate.
They are therefore comparable to watches produced by Rolex for the Peruvian Air Force and French jumping company Comex, especially where a special dial was printed for the watch, thereby ensuring its rarity.
Other extremely pursued “Omani” timepieces include sports/jumping watches such as the Reference 1665 Rolex Sea-Dweller, Reference 1675 GMT Master, and Reference 16800 Submariner, frequently introduced to Oman’s military and police forces, and more classic styles of dress watches such as the Datejust and Oyster Perpetual, regularly in gold.
Some of these watches are in immaculate condition, having been treasured by their proprietors in their introduction boxes, while others, having been presented to the Omani warmth and mugginess have created satisfying patina on all fours/p>
Rolexes as remunerations for bravery
Of particular interest to European and especially British collectors were the watches accepted to have been introduced by Sultan Qaboos to individuals from Britain’s official and mercenary military staff who were associated with the 1970 coup where British forces orchestrated Qaboos to dismiss his father, Sultan Taimur, who had administered Muscat and Oman (as it was then known) as an archaic backwater since 1932.
According to Daniel Bourn’s educational article on vintage-db.com : “The Rolex 1665 Omani Sea-Dwellers with either RED Khanjar or Qaboos dial script, were commissioned by Sultan Qaboos receptacle Sa’id by means of Asprey of London in the mid 1970s and introduced to the British Military SAS troops who had served in Oman during the Dhofar resistance between 1970-1976.”
Bourn proceeds to express that some 80-90 red Khanjar Sea-Dwellers ordered by Sultan Qaboos through Asprey in London rather than directly from Rolex in Switzerland (more on this later) were introduced to military staff. The whereabouts of around 30 of these watches is known.
Interestingly, four “gold” Khanjar Sea-Dwellers have additionally come to light, which on a simply statistical premise recommends that some 9-12 gold Khanjar watches were introduced (gold considered more renowned than the red Khanjar), and that this number may correspond to the nine SAS individuals who partook in the skirmish of Mirbat on 19 July 1972, where nine SAS individuals saw off an attack by 250 Dhofar rebels. The fight has purportedly been compared by some to the Battle of Rorke’s Drift .
However, in an update to my past data, I talked recently to a UK-based Rolex and Patek Philippe collector passing by the name of the “Watch Baron,” who got one of the gold Khanjar Sea-Dwellers around seven years prior subsequent to hearing the account of the “Mirbat nine.” He has since sold the watch, yet says that curiosity improved of him and that, equipped with one of a few books that relate the Mirbat story, he figured out how to track down one of the previous SAS individuals involved.
When found out if he had been granted a gold Khanjar Rolex Sea-Dweller for his association, the SAS man snickered incredulously and answered categorically that neither he nor his colleagues received any recompense of any kind for their job in that fight, not to mention a Rolex. Previous SAS men being what they are, and given the clandestine idea of British military inclusion in Oman at that point, one may contend that “he would say that, wouldn’t he?” But Watch Baron guarantees me that from the way in which said SAS man reacted, he is 99.9 percent sure that he was telling the truth.
Unless someone comes forward to confirm it, it is therefore maybe an ideal opportunity to take care of the Mirbat Rolex legend that has through constant redundancy become accepted as absolute truth among collectors, despite the fact that it was just at any point advanced as a mathematical hypothesis (see Mythbusting: 3 Persistent Patek Philippe And Rolex Myths Debunked for more).
My own theory, which is only an educated conjecture and not any more substantial than anybody else’s, is that in the absence of clear provenance of any of these Khanjar Sea-Dwellers from the mid 1970s, they may have been introduced to the different crew of British officers and “political inhabitants” who both coordinated the 1970 coup and administered the progress of capacity to the new Sultan for quite a while thereafter and can be seen presenting solidly behind their young protégé in numerous photos from that period. Given the degree to which the UK government concealed its part in the palace coup, the recipients of these watches were and are probably not going to at any point confess to playing that role.
In any occasion , combination of an evidently set number of Rolex watches produced to arrange with special dials and introduced to war saints by an Arabian sultan is an exciting blend making for a perfect tempest of collectability (Bourn is by his own description a “vendor in uncommon and significant vintage watches”).
But would you need to claim one?
Dark am I, yet exquisite, girls of Jerusalem.
Do not gaze because I am dull, for the sun has looked at me.
My mother’s children were furious with me; they made me a guardian of the grape plantations, yet my own grape plantation I have neglected.
Song of Songs, 1:5, 6
In 1969 I was seven years of age and lived with my folks in a pristine house worked in a little enclave worked at Ras al Hamra, a couple of miles west of Muscat, for the representatives of Petroleum Development Oman (PDO), the consortium set up to abuse Oman’s recently discovered oil holds. Based on a rocky spike getting down to the ocean, a region accordingly distinguished by Italian archeologists as the site of flourishing mangrove marshes and tracker angler settlements during Arabia’s pre-desertification period 6-10,000 years prior, as a likely objective for the British-backed sultan’s political adversaries the “camp” was enclosed at a discreet distance by a wire fence and security gates.
But one day while I was playing in the sand and rock that filled in as a nursery before our home, a group of goats came cantering across our nursery from the western side of the camp, fervently sought after by a young lady in a filthy battered red dress carrying a stick.
She was likely just six or seven years of age and would have lived in one of the frantically helpless towns we gave the best approach to Muscat consisting of hovels whose dividers and rooftops were made of date palm branches.
When she saw me, she halted abruptly and stood taking a gander at me for seemingly an unending length of time. Her skin was dimly tanned yet her disheveled hair was bleached blonde by the sun, and her eyes were huge and alert, scrutinizing me finally, the two of us gatecrashers in each other’s reality. At last she set off in quest for her goats.
During the four years we lived in Oman, this was the closest I at any point came to meeting an Omani child.
First watch in Oman
I was watch-mindful since the beginning. My father took me to purchase my first watch in Dubai when I was eight years of age (Oman didn’t have watches available to be purchased back then, and certainly not for children); it was a manual-wind, steel-encased young men’s watch on a steel bracelet with a red second hand and iridescent Mercedes hour and moment hands that lit up like Blackpool tower at night.
It fascinated me; in bed around evening time I would respect the tumor-inducing sparkle of the hands and records prior to laying it on my pad to hear it out ticking.
I likewise scholarly the dynamics of “tropical” maturing of a watch at an exceptionally youthful age. My closest companion at the time was an English kid called Nigel, whom I held in extraordinary regard because when I initially met him in the flights relax at Heathrow air terminal, he was wearing a Blue Peter identification .
Almost as significant to me at that point, his father George Band had accompanied Edmund Hillary on the successful 1953 Mount Everest campaign (wearing a white-dial Oyster Perpetual like the remainder of the group). Maybe accordingly we used to invest a great deal of energy climbing things – dividers, rooftops, all through aqueducts, whatever was available.
Once, in the wake of scaling a ten-foot segment divider by the porch to the back of their home, Nigel let out a happy yell and picked up a watch from the highest point of the heating hot divider. “So this is the place where I left it!” Several months of Omani sun and temperatures more than 40 degrees Celsius had stripped the watch of its unique color scheme since his past ascent of the divider; I don’t recall whether it still worked.
Some Omani history
In her book Sultan in Oman , Jan Morris (who was James Morris at that point) describes an Omani tribesman with whom she was having tea in a desert spring hanging over to inspect her watch, asking “is it a Longines”?
This shows the degree of watch brand mindfulness in mid-1950s Oman, most likely because of Saudi influence, where the giving of notoriety watches had become a set up practice and an indicator of the recipient’s standing.
Morris’ watch was not a top-level brand known to the tribesman, leaving him uncertain regarding whether his insight into Swiss watch brands was deficient and Morris was potentially an individual of incredible importance, or Morris was only no one worth mentioning with an unexceptional watch.
Britain’s part in Oman
As far as Oman is concerned, the British press has all in all either basically not detailed occasions or followed the official line of depicting the UK’s relationship with Oman as “amicable help,” giving resources military and otherwise to a “bloodless coup” and assisting the current sultan with setting out the long late reform and modernization of his country by assisting him with dismissing his repulsive, despotic father.
While the last isn’t in debate, this is an extremely selective and deluding perusing of history.
It endeavors to depict Oman as being independent from and resistant to the post-World War II disturbance whereby the United Nations rejected colonialism and the European forces pulled out from their African, Asian, and Arab colonial regions, once in a while intentionally, some of the time at gunpoint, as in Algeria. Oman was “extraordinary,” despite the fact that it was never clarified how or why. Oman had no requirement for Algerian-style independence because it was an “free sway” already.
The insurgency in the uneven Dhofar district toward the south, which gathered strength all through the 1960s and 70s and on occasion looked ready to subvert the new sultanate, was introduced as a Soviet and Chinese-backed plot to make a case for Oman’s oil, and therefore a danger to the UK’s advantages that justified unforgiving military mediation. Just in 1972 did the Observer and Sunday Times papers try to describe the conflict as “England’s secret war.”
A typical description of the circumstance in Oman at the time peruses as follows:
“Oman itself was probably as backward as possible perhaps be. It was poor and controlled by a sultan who was archaic in his disposition to advance. In spite of the recent discovery of oil in commercial amounts, he was in no rush to modernize his country. Outside of the capital Muscat, there were no streets, no clinics, no schools, no electricity, no funneled water and no position other than the sultan. . . . In July 1970, the sultan’s child Qaboos canister Said expelled his father in a palace coup and declared himself leader of Oman. This was a mainstream move and achieved prompt changes, as the new sultan was prepared to modernize his country.”
The the truth was that Britain had run Oman as a true colony in everything except name since the decline of Portuguese and afterward Ottoman influence during the 1870s, and had kept up the India-educated Sultan Taimur in force since 1932 by financing 50 percent of the country’s unobtrusive spending plan and continuing to do as such until the 1970s when oil incomes started to pour in.
Strategic estimation of Oman
Situated on the Indian Ocean at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, Oman’s sole revenue to Britain was as a strategic station while in transit to India from where it could control transporting coming from the Gulf and later on by means of the Suez Canal, so day to day environments for the populace in this “protectorate” were of little concern to Whitehall.
In 1970, Oman had a newborn child death pace of 75 percent, and trachoma, venereal sickness, and ailing health were broad. There were just three schools, the literacy rate was five percent, and there were just six miles of cleared streets. Given that its military officers and “political specialists” occupied everything except one of the senior military and authoritative posts in Muscat and Oman, this was shocking for which Britain was as a rule responsible.
More significantly, the battle in Dhofar was more than British-backed: British troopers and “contract officers” (mercenaries) actually did much of the battling, utilizing “scorched earth” techniques like those utilized in Vietnam, consuming and obliterating towns suspected of having rebel feelings as a component of a “hearts and psyches” strategy.
One officer is cited as saying , “We torched rebel towns and shot their goats and cows . . . Any foe corpses we recovered were propped up in the Salalah souk as a helpful exercise to any future opportunity fighters.”
UK academic and essayist Fred Halliday figured out how to visit the Dhofar district during the battling in 1972 and detailed in his book Arabia Without Sultans : “The best difficulty caused by the new counter-progressive methodology was the enduring inflicted on the populace. Everyone one met had lost creatures in the recent battling, and many had lost individuals from their family . . . the economic blockade had let to serious lack of healthy sustenance, especially in the east and in the center because of the cutting off of imports from the coast and the systematic SOAF consuming of crops at gather time… such improvements just confirmed individuals in their hatred of the British and the Sultan . . .”.
To summarize, while press and media reports and articles of the time describe Sultan Qaboos’ expulsion of his despotic father as a good endeavor that justified Britain’s full good, logistical, and military help, the more noteworthy picture has consistently been that it was just necessary because Britain had saved Taimur in force for so long.
And the lone explanation it had at long last been persuaded to take care of business was that Taimur was increasingly becoming an obstacle to the extraction of Oman’s oil saves – by PDO, a consortium ultimately overwhelmed by Shell, a Netherlands/British-possessed company. The ensuing Dhofar insubordination and its concealment were a war much like some other battle, with atrocities executed on both sides.
However, Britain’s continuing control over the country made it conceivable to completely block press access to the combat area, thereby controlling data that just became public information at a much later date.
Last stronghold of slavery
According to Guardian writer Ian Cobain, until 1970 “Oman was the keep going country on earth where bondage stayed lawful. The sultan possessed around 500 slaves. An expected 150 of them were ladies, whom he kept at his palace at Salalah; some of his male slaves were said to have been physically distorted by the cruelties they had suffered.”
The fact the new sultan continued to arrange Rolexes and other watches through Asprey in London, rather than directly from the manufacturer, only confirms the grasp that Britain continued to apply over the country.
Where does this leave watch collectors and their profoundly sought-after Omani Rolexes?
These watches are for the most part introduced by Rolex vendors and devotees as romantic keepsakes of a former time, granted to overlooked military legends for acts of fortitude by the reformist sultan of one of the more liberal Arab countries.
According to Halliday in a similar book, the official British line communicated in a 1970 Defense White Paper (when Secretary of State for Defense Ian Gilmour was extremely reluctant to give out data on the conflict) was that “The Sultan of Muscat’s military, a large portion of whose officers are British, have continued to be occupied with tasks against the Dhofar rebels in the tough slope country north of Salalah. The Sultan has made honors for fortitude to some British officers for their conduct in these operations.”
Presumably a portion of these honors included watches produced to arrange by Rolex through Asprey in London with the Omani khanjar on the dial. A portion of these watches may surely constitute recognition of the dauntlessness in combat of British troopers (and to a significant degree, mercenaries) that went unacknowledged for a long time by the British government as it was reluctant to be believed to decorate military staff who were apparently there in an absolutely “warning” role.
As a previous inhabitant of Oman in the last part of the 1960s and mid 1970s, I am the first to recognize that my family’s wellbeing was ensured during that period by the presence of the British military, both in the Muscat district and at Natih and Fahud in the inside where the oil stages stood.
However, these watches additionally address a less engaging aspect of the country’s set of experiences: specifically a lot of duty regarding the country’s complete inability to grow economically and socially from the nineteenth century until the 1970s, and the consequent enduring of the native populace because of the lack of education and healthcare, helpless nourishment, and military conflict.
Sometimes attractive artifacts come with uncomfortable or even unpalatable cultural and historical facts. A synopsis check of the different watch managing sites uncovers that a nice red “Qaboos” Submariner with patina’d hands and files is currently accessible, yet “price on solicitation” – a well known doublespeak for “in the event that you need to ask, you can’t bear it.”
Perhaps one day I will have the way to acquire one, however in the event that I do the red mark will consistently help me to remember the young lady in the worn out red dress.
Quick Facts Rolex Sea-Dweller Reference 1665 Red Khanjar/Qaboos
Case: 40 x 17.7 mm, tempered steel with helium escape valve
Dial: Omani Khanjar or Qaboos signature in brilliant red rather than “twofold red” lines, tritium-filled hands and markers
Development: automatic Rolex Caliber 1570, 26 gems, officially certified C.O.S.C. chronometers
Functions: hours, minutes, seconds; date
Long stretches of manufacture: mid 1970s
* This article was first distributed on December 5, 2019 at Khanjar And Qaboos Rolexes: Are They The Vintage Watch Industry’s Blood Diamonds?
You may likewise enjoy:
Mythbusting: 3 Persistent Patek Philippe And Rolex Myths Debunked
Professional Diver Nigel Band And The Unusual Rolex Sea-Dweller And Oyster Perpetual Models That Plumbed The Depths And Scaled The Heights
Tracing The History Of My Grandfather’s Pocket Watch And Delving Into English Watchmaking
Gerontohorologyphobia: A Young Man’s Fear Of Being Seen Wearing An Old Man’s Watch