Primary Navigation

What We Liked And What We Didn’t Like At The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève, Plus How Well Our Panel’s Forecasts Did (Spoiler Alert: Not Very) | Quill & Pad

What We Liked And What We Didn’t Like At The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève, Plus How Well Our Panel’s Forecasts Did (Spoiler Alert: Not Very) | Quill & Pad

In this last round table conversation, my Quill & Pad partners and I talk about the virtual night of November 12, 2020 and our opinion about the enormous night’s winners . Our board comprises of:

Elizabeth Doerr (ED), fellow benefactor and proofreader in-boss

Ian Skellern (IS), fellow benefactor and specialized chief

Joshua Munchow (JM), inhabitant geek author

GaryG (GG), inhabitant gatherer

Martin Green (MG), inhabitant gentleman

Eric de Rocquigny of Van Cleef & Arpels tolerating the Artistic Crafts grant at the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (photograph graciousness GPHG/www.point-of-views.ch)

ED: Before we plunge into this, I believe it’s essential to stretch the key changes to the manner in which the GPHG casting a ballot happened in 2020, what began with the formation of a different Academy of givers who played out the principal “screening” to show up at the six “selected” watches in every classification, the benefits of which we talked about here in our round tables at length.

Then the classes proceeded to be decided on by an atomic jury of 30 individuals . In that last round of casting a ballot the Academy additionally casted a ballot once more, the whole of which was equivalent to three votes in the last round – which made for an aggregate of 33 individual votes.

Due to the COVID-19 circumstance with its desperate travel and occasion limitations this fall, the whole in-person jury was looked over inside Switzerland, which made it conceivable to have an occasion by any means. Notwithstanding, it likewise implied that its variety and viewpoint was additionally definitely diminished. Just six of those 30 had recently been on the jury anytime, including jury head Aurel Bacs and bad habit head Gianfranco Ritschel.

The consequences of the enormous night address an extremely Swiss-disapproved of jury conscious of the governmental issues, inward subtleties, and engines that keep the watch business running.

All of the winners in the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (photograph politeness GPHG/www.point-of-views.ch)

JM: As the occasion started with no genuine pageantry and situation, no motorcade of participants, and as the almost unfilled venue materialized it was clear this would have been an alternate experience.

And yet one thing was as yet unchanged: the horrendous interpretation voiceover. The interpreters were extraordinary, doing a decent work of keeping up and attempting to share the go along with and keep up the speed. Yet, genuinely, I don’t have the foggiest idea who I need to address about this: when you have a deciphered livestream, the host needs to have his sound almost quieted else it resembles tuning in to two individuals competing for your consideration in various dialects; no one wins.

ED: This is the main year I’ve at any point watched it from home, Joshua, and, goodness, presently I hear what you’re saying! That was basically terrible. I turned to the exclusively French transmission before long as I was unable to see either the English or the French on the interpretation channel. Additionally, when the host or speaker was communicating in English, and the interpreter quit talking, we were compensated with input and twofold voices. Somebody clearly isn’t working the amplifiers accurately. I can hardly imagine how that happens year after year!

JM: Aside from that common issue, the coordinators benefited have thoughts for this socially removed honor show. In the first place, it was an extraordinary thought to have numerous platform to keep individuals isolated and decrease vicinity because of individuals sharing amplifiers. The moderators had the option to stay away and just the winners would come up to the platform in front of an audience, limiting danger, which as an American is reviving to see.

Another smart thought was to evade the “swarm pleaser” exercises like exhibitions, extensive joke-filled discourses, and recordings intended to separate the show and engage the group. With no group, the show had the option to keep a genuinely decent speed and never did it seem a lot of like it was slacking other than maybe during the leadup to the Special Jury prize and the Aiguille d’Or, however that was insignificant compared to other years.

Overall, the show design was fairly pleasant thinking about the requirement for basically nobody to really join in. As somebody who has never joined in (and never been asked . . . hack . . .) it wasn’t drastically extraordinary as a livestream watcher, however I envision that in person it was a major shift.

ED: The greatest thing I really appreciated about watching from home was drinking my bubbly during the show!

Socially separated audience at the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (photograph civility GPHG/www.point-of-views.ch)

JM: I’d be glad to see a portion of these modifications stay pushing ahead as it smoothed out the show a piece, evading a portion of the common ponderousness that accompanies jokes to global audiences.

ED: Yes, the jokes! What’s more, here’s something amusing I saw: the applauding, chuckling, and so forth was funneled in. Which isn’t surprising at the present time; Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO, for instance, has done likewise every Friday night all through the pandemic. However, during Aurel Bacs’ incredible recognition for Antoine Simonin, in any event two of the jokes figured out how to seem to crash and burn since, I suspect, Aurel’s reverence was in English and whoever was working the snicker button didn’t comprehend or wasn’t following. That was a shame.

But on to the watches!

GG: Well, it is possible that I truly expected to see a greater amount of those watches face to face or my preferences are very unique in relation to those of the current year’s GPHG legal hearers in light of the fact that, except if I tallied erroneously, I think I just picked two of the 14 classification winners accurately this time around – albeit in the instances of the Petermann Bédat and Parmigiani two of my classification picks were raised to wins in the “greater” prizes.

Heck, there were three winners that weren’t even in my underlying six picks in the first round!

ED: I have counted up our right expectations toward the finish of this post, Gary. I would rather not say it, however you and I fared the most exceedingly terrible of all our colleagues!

IS: I didn’t see nor handle the greater part of the finalist watches in the 2020 GPHG, and I’m very much aware exactly how significant/fundamental that is. So I was completely anticipating that the jury should choose a couple of winners that I didn’t pick. So far so typical. Notwithstanding, because of COVID-19 limitations, the jury was a lot more modest and considerably more homogenous than expected (all Swiss-based), and I was amazed what a distinction that made.

It’s not the GPHG coordinators’ flaw that the cosmetics of the jury must be so limited for the current year, as Elizabeth clarified at the start, yet I firmly feel that if the occasion is to recover a portion of the validity lost in the 2020 laureate determination – and the occasion positively lost believability in my eyes – at that point I imagine that the GPHG committee ought to distribute a couple of clear rules regarding what the jury should consider in the judging. It seems like you would be better off perusing tea leaves to divine the best watches in each category.

Here are a couple of things I’d like the getting sorted out committee to explain so that there is more straightforwardness in the judging:

1. Should retail cost be considered or not? It’s far simpler to make a costly standout watch than a less expensive one, however do we generally need the most costly watches to win?2. Should past successes be considered? On the off chance that essentially a similar watch has just won a prize in an earlier year, should that represent a mark against it? Or on the other hand should each year be treated as a disconnected case? In the event that the last mentioned, I expect we will see diverse hued Tudor Black Bays winning prizes for quite a long time to come.

3. Should the class title be considered or simply the principles? Or on the other hand neither once a watch has been named? I’m interested how the most un-complicated watch – Greubel Forsey’s Hand Made 1 – won the Men’s Complication prize. It’s an awesome watch (I thought it most amazing aspect show), yet complicated?

4. Are tourbillons complications or not? In fact a complication drives a sign, and a tourbillon is a sort of escapement instead of a complication. I’m no fanatic for that translation, yet I believe that it’s insane that such countless generally basic watches with tourbillons were knock out of the Men’s and Ladies’ classes into the Complication classifications. I recommend either permitting tourbillons in the Men’s and Ladies’ classifications or making a different category.

5. Should quartz as well as smartwatches be discrete categories?

6. The GPHG should share features from the jury’s choices in picking a victor. They are passing judgment on watches not a homicide preliminary and there’s no explanation general society shouldn’t be educated how/why the jury comes to their choices. They could even take a leaf from the U.S. High Court and have two jury individuals separately compose a short larger part assessment and, if not consistent, a contradicting assessment featuring the qualities of the next in line. It appears to me that the jury overlooked the class title and classification rules as a to direct judging and basically picked their top choices of the six named watches as per any rules they felt like. Assuming this is the case, I’ve no issue with that. Yet, the GPHG should make that clear.

My greatest frustrations were the absence of acknowledgment for the Armin Strom Minute Repeater Resonance , Bernhard Lederer Central Impulse Chronometer (in spite of the fact that I figure Lederer ought to have entered the vastly improved looking full-dial adaptation), and De Bethune DB28XP Starry Sky (in spite of the fact that I imagine that De Bethune ought to have entered the more steady De Bethune DB28XP all things being equal), and the Ming 18.01 H41 jumper’s watch .

ED: Yes, indeed Armin Strom returned home with practically nothing. Only extraordinary to me that a brand presents a dependably working, standard reverberation watch and not once brings home a prize for it in any variety notwithstanding entering extremely new versions of it since 2015. Great on Armin Strom for proceeding to peck away at it by proceeding to enter the GPHG – that is a decent method to fabricate brand acknowledgment. As Karl-Friedrich Scheufele said in tolerating the 2017 Aiguille d’Or for the L.U.C Full Strike Minute Repeater , here and there it simply takes somewhat more until the breakthrough.

IS: My three greatest “what in the world was the jury thinking?” minutes went to Breitling (Diver’s and Petite Aiguille) and Charles Girardier (Ladies’ Complication).

More than 99 red balloons filled the audience seats of the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (photograph civility GPHG/www.point-of-views.ch)

JM: There were 18 absolute watches that won prizes, however eight of those watches (45%) were addressed by only four brands. I can comprehend one brand lucking out and hitting two classifications on the very year; it’s not incredible. In any case, four brands getting twofold prizes shows an absence of assortment and point of view as I would see it. I know there is a great deal of subjectivity here, yet there were many, MANY phenomenal watches that got no prizes, numerous brands that returned home with next to nothing. Be that as it may, Breitling went in for seconds? Possibly it shows my predisposition for assortment, inventiveness, and new thoughts, yet this was a tish pathetic.

In 2019 Audemars Piguet triple plunged, adventitiously the exact year it got totally dragged for the questionable dispatch and resulting PR calamity with the Code 11.59 . Proceeding with that pattern truly causes me to feel like we need to make it official: #GPHGSoWhite #GPHGSoPolitical.

And with that I presumably seal my destiny of never being approached to join the Academy or to pass judgment – or even go to the show. I’m not saying I, or we at Quill & Pad, are the referees of value or worth, yet given that we normally anticipate 60-90 percent of the winners among us, and this year we missed on so many, makes me question things. However, I would prefer not to seem like a bad sport requesting a relate of the votes, so I’ll simply say I was shocked this year.

MG: I felt that this year’s version had its good and bad times. I thought that it was hard now and again to follow the thinking of the jury, and I believe that further tweaking of the idea is deprived for the GPHG to arrive at its full potential.

ED: And on to the individual categories.

Ladies: Bovet Miss Audrey

JM: This is an extraordinary watch from an incredible brand. I didn’t get it would take the crown, however I additionally realized it would be in the running given its straightforwardness and excellence. I generally love when Bovet gets perceived and regardless of whether I loved others maybe more this is unquestionably an incredible piece.

Bovet Amadéo Fleurier 36 Miss Audrey with green guilloche dial

MG: There were no dishonorable watches in this classification, yet I am glad to see that the Bovet won. It is a shocking watch, exemplary yet creative both plan and execution. As far as refinement, the most awesome aspect the bundle says a ton as the competition was intense.

IS: I picked the Bovet 1822 Miss Audrey as my nearby sprinter up in the Ladies’ class and think it an obvious and merited champ here.

ED: This energetic green Miss Audrey was additionally my pre-occasion second place, Ian, and I think that its a sheer enjoyment. On the off chance that the others decided in favor of this, I am glad to recognize the supported headband on its head.

See how our board casted a ballot in Our Predictions In The Ladies Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): A Sprinkling Of Jewels, A Mismatched Date, And The Ever-Raging Debate On Quartz

Further reading:

Bovet Amadéo Fleurier 36 Miss Audrey: The World’s Most Versatile Ladies’ Watch, And One Of The Prettiest

Give Me Five! From The 2015 Bovet Collection

Ladies Complication: Charles Girardier Tourbillon Signature Mystérieuse Fleur de Sel

GG: In a shocking triumph for admirers of “thingies” all over the place, the victory of the Charles Girardier Tourbillon Signature Mystérieuse. I’d have wagered more promptly on Donald Trump winning California than on the Girardier at the GPHG, however it simply demonstrates how wrong one can be!

Charles Girardier Tourbillon Signature Mystérieuse Fleur de Sel

MG: I am somewhat astonished that the Girardier figured out how to come out on top over the world’s littlest tourbillon (Bulgari), one of the world’s slimmest tourbillons (Piaget), and perhaps the most over-the-top tourbillons (Jacob & Co). I realize that it involves the manner in which the weighted democratic falls, however in cases like this I am likewise inquisitive about the inspirations of the votes.

IS: The Charles Girardier Tourbillon Signature Mystérieuse Fleur de Sel is without question an exceptionally beautiful watch. Yet, how a tourbillon and turning plate acquired it best Ladies Complication is past me. Particularly compared with what I feel were gives over more advantageous winners. I’d love to understand what swung the jury in this category.

ED: So would I. I was pondering this long into the night a short time later . . .was it the precious stones on the tourbillon confine? Was it the excellent paillonée finish dial? However lovely as these components may be, this watch is as yet a relative unknown.

Meanwhile, notwithstanding, we here at Quill & Pad discover somewhat more about it as one of our old industry companions sent us an email after we distributed the Ladies Complication round table . The watch is by all accounts known in Switzerland – there’s that favorable position of the Swiss jury once more! – with a TV channel in any event, having communicated something about the watch back in August.

Unfortunately, since none of us live in Switzerland any longer, we have not been conscious of the communication. So I am very certain on the off chance that we had gotten the opportunity to deal with this watch face to face, we may have come away with an unexpected assessment in comparison to we do now – or did in October when we composed the round table.

JM: It’s a decent watch; it has something beyond a tourbillon, regardless of whether it is anything but a complication and rather a doodad of sorts. However, at this point in the entertainment ceremony, I had not picked a solitary victor. Consistently I ordinarily pick 50-65 percent of the winners; now it turned out to be certain that something was unquestionably not going my way.

See how our expectations went in Our Predictions In The Ladies Complication Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Is A Tourbillon Complicated Enough?

Men’s: Kari Voutilainen 28SC

ED: Kari won this class a year ago as well – his streak rarely end!.!. (laughs)

Voutilainen 28SC

JM: Surprising yet very merited! I didn’t pick it however just on the grounds that I generally keep thinking about whether the jury will limit marks that success frequently yet it is a darn decent men’s watch and difficult to contend with! However, since it won this class a year ago (I truly would have bet the jury explicitly attempting to keep away from a consecutive success) it currently becomes Kari Voutilainen’s commitment to attempt and threepeat by making the best Men’s watch of 2021. Would he be able to do it? It would be remarkable and would mean he has ruled both the Men’s and Artistic Crafts categories.

GG: We’ll never know how the first democratic in the classes from which the night’s enormous prize winners arose initially went, yet my theory is that the Voutilainen may have profited by the takeoff of the Petermann Bédat , which got the Horological Revelation prize. I’ve been a benefactor of Kari’s for over twelve years and know the nature of his work regardless of whether this is “simply one more” Vingt-8.

MG: While the Voutilainen is assuredly an imposing watch, I am astounded that it won among this arrangement of six. For a Voutilainen, I believe that the watch is all in all too downplayed. Yet, in the event that there is one thing that we have seen here, it is that the jury has casted a ballot minimalistically overall. I’m likewise glad that the Petermann Bédat won the Horological Revelation prize. I can’t hold back to see a greater amount of this brand.

IS: While the Voutilainen 28SC wasn’t my top pick here, it’s an extraordinary decision and I wasn’t astonished. Kari Voutilainen has won so numerous GPHG prizes since he ought to have his own category.

See how well we anticipated (or didn’t) in Our Predictions In The Men’s Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): All 6 Are Potential Winners But Our Panelists Ruthlessly Whittle Them Down

Men’s Complication: Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1

MG: I won’t rehash my contention that this class has been given some unacceptable name and simply extol the victor. The Hand Made 1 is a watch that gives me goosebumps, a standout watch, one that stretches the limits even at Greubel Forsey, and that is saying a lot!

Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1

IS: I felt that the Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1 was acceptable to such an extent that it was the force to be reckoned with for Aiguille d’Or. In any case, showing only hours, minutes, and seconds, how one of the most un-complicated watches out of the six finalists took the prize for best Men’s Complication is past me. Beside its tourbillon escapement, it qualified in the Men’s class. Hand Made 1 unquestionably merited a prize, yet best complication? That is another head-scratcher for me as well, Martin.

GG: An especially merited success in my view went to this piece, which I moreover picked for the Aiguille d’Or.

JM: Utterly phenomenal watch. Not a complication but rather, hello, 2020 doesn’t mean anything so for what reason should classes have any significance as well? This watch may have merited the Aiguille d’Or, however I was at that point somewhat disillusioned with the decisions in this class from the beginning so I shouldn’t actually continue on pointlessly that is the expression “complication.” Still, overly glad for Greubel Forsey as this watch is magnificent.

Stephen Forsey and David Bernard tolerating the prize for Best Men’s Complication for Hand Made 1 at the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (photograph graciousness GPHG/www.point-of-views.ch)

ED: Aside from the standout watch itself, I love that Stephen Forsey welcomed David Bernard in front of an audience with him to acknowledge the prize as the top of the division responsible for the Hand Made 1. You don’t see a CEO or company proprietor sharing the spotlight regularly, and that says a lot to the nature of Forsey’s character.

See how everybody did with their expectations (and hear us out issue about the utilization of the word “complication” here) in Our Predictions In The Men’s Complication Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Is A Tourbillon A Complication? Part Deux

Further reading:

Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1: Hands Breathing Life Into Metal

Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1: Making A Watch The Traditional Way (Video)

Iconic: Bulgari Aluminum Chronograph

JM: This is an odd class as a rule to judge yet this success bodes well. The stylish of this watch is really famous from the brand: regardless of whether the specific watch isn’t as long running a model as a portion of the others, the style has been around for some time. I realized this class could go a great deal of ways and keeping in mind that it appears I am definitely off-base on a considerable lot of the winners, this follows for the category.

Bulgari Aluminum chronograph

GG: In the “what were they thinking” arrangement, I’ll note something besides the IWC Portugieser in the Iconic classification . . .

MG: The success for the Bulgari Aluminum strikes me as very helpful for the brand as it just relaunched this watch. I’m speculating most of the jury was in its mid thirties during the 1990s, maybe shaking the first model and felt nostalgic. For what it will be, it is an extraordinary watch. However, when you talk about symbols, I believe that the other five watches in the class carry somewhat more family to the table.

IS: Nice watch, however the most enduring effect on watchmaking and its set of experiences? This simply supports my view that the Iconic class ought to be dropped. It’s simply an approach to offer prizes to enormous brands.

See how our forecasts went in Our Predictions In The Iconic Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Another Head-Scratcher For Our Panelists But There’s A Clear Favorite

Further reading: New Bulgari Aluminum Watches For 2020: The Past As A Roadmap To The Future

Calendar and Astronomy: Vacheron Constantin Overseas QP Ultra Thin Skeleton

MG: I surmise the jury went for gold! While I actually like my Overseas Perpetual with a full dial, I can comprehend this decision: this arrangement was too acceptable to even consider leaving behind for some hearers. On the wrist, the watch feels awesome and strong yet additionally wonderfully comfortable gratitude to its thin profile. One thing I do contemplate whether the jury likewise mulled over that this watch comes with extra ties in the snappy change framework? Provided that this is true, it may have been the mystery weapon.

Vacheron Constantin Overseas Ultra-Thin Perpetual Calendar

JM: In a class zeroing in on schedules and stargazing, a super slight never-ending schedule skeleton from one of the large three will be difficult to beat except if you’ve brought your A game. The competition was respectable for this prize, and I could have seen it go another way, yet I’m cheerful I anticipated what the jury would wind up going with.

GG: The combination of the Vacheron Overseas case, Caliber 1120 base development, and skeletonization checks a ton of boxes for me. It might, be that as it may, have profited here with the takeoff of the Parmigiani Hijri piece to get the Innovation prize.

ED: That is a decent inquiry, Gary. Albeit most in our board picked the Sarpaneva during the round table conversation , much of the time this Vacheron Constantin was our aggregate second place. I would have jumped at the chance to have seen the Sarpaneva regarded for its extraordinary imagination truth be told, however I will confess to having been torn about inclination that route as this Overseas Perpetual Calendar is basically one dazzling piece of horology. Having seen it in the metal just built up that feeling for me. A merited winner.

IS: In my GPHG forecast for this class I composed of the Vacheron Constantin Overseas Perpetual Calendar Ultra-Thin Skeleton, “This is the both the most creative and the most specialized looking of the three classic interminable schedules here, yet I’m searching for more advancement from the victor.” I didn’t pick it however it’s a shocking watch and I can see its appreciation for the jury.

See how everybody did with their expectations in Our Predictions In The Calendar And Astronomy Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): We See A Good Moon A-Rising

Further reading: Vacheron Constantin Overseas Ultra-Thin Perpetual Calendar Skeleton (Video)

Chronograph: H. Moser & Cie Streamliner Flyback Chrono

JM: Another champ I picked! It’s additionally one that I would battle for, overly glad to see a particularly cool watch win and one that has the inconceivable AgenGraphe inside. I certainly think it merits the title this year. Happy to see the jury isn’t completely irrational as this piece stands firmly against different chronographs this year.

H. Moser & Cie Streamliner Flyback Chronograph Automatic

MG: I imagine that the best chronograph won. This H. Moser does such countless things so well and is unique in its methodology. As far as I might be concerned, a superior decision could barely have been made,

IS: The Moser Streamliner Flyback Chronograph Automatic was my hands-down pick to win this class. Another great call from the jury.

ED: While this watch maybe wasn’t my pick as champ here, I commend the jury for picking this amazing chronograph. No complaints from me.

I should likewise specify something H. Moser & Cie CEO Édouard Meylan said while tolerating this honor. He got down on his case provider, Guillod Gunther, who created the Streamliner’s out of control hardened steel lodging. “It’s a stunning group and they worked effectively,” Meylan said. “Tragically, they should shut down because of the COVID-19 circumstance. While many would have recently closed down, leaving us standing, they worked with us to put together the progress to another provider so we in the end we were not affected.”

Meylan revealed to me subsequently that he needed to say thanks to them and recognize that without providers (like that) there wouldn’t be brands like Moser. He likewise expressed gratitude toward Jean-Marc Wiederrecht and Agenhor for the amazing type. I locate that commendable on all parts.

GG: No complaints about the Moser win here, albeit the AgenGraphe-based Streamliner isn’t to my own taste tastefully (and I favored the Atelier de Chronométrie and Parmigiani pieces by and large in this class in any case).

See our forecasts in Our Predictions In The Chronograph Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Limited Editions Rule The Roost

Further reading:

Moser & Cie. Streamliner Flyback Chronograph Automatic With Full Metal Bracelet: Inspiring Amnemori!

The AgenGraphe By Agenhor: The Most Significant Chronograph Since . . . Since The Invention Of The Chronograph (With Videos)

Chronometry: Ferdinand Berthoud 2RE.2

ED: Ferdinand Berthoud was the victor in this classification a year ago too – I keep thinking about whether this is additionally the start of a streak for the shop brand living inside the Chopard organization?

Ferdinand Berthoud Chronomètre FB 2RE in pink gold

IS: The Chronométrie Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE.2 was a hands-down victor for me in this class and I thought it had a decent possibility at the Aiguille d’Or.

GG: A merited win!

JM: Clear victor, very energized that it won! Yet, I likewise picked it for the Aiguille d’Or so somewhat dismal it will not win for that one, however I can’t contend in any capacity that another watch was more deserving to win the Chronometry prize. This is a genuine chalice watch and it merits each ounce of awards it gets. Given simply the chronometric results it should win, however the style and art are additionally best in class in the category.

MG: A very merited success for Ferdinand Berthoud. The competition was intense in this classification, yet given the specialized arrangement of this watch, round case, and incredibly high completing evaluation, I figure you can barely improve. Without the Berthoud in the blend, I accept that the jury would have had a substantially more troublesome undertaking as hit a next in line would have been almost impossible.

How did our expectations go in this classification? See them here: Our Predictions In The Chronometry Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Our Panel Is United, But Not Unanimous

Further reading:

Ferdinand Berthoud Chronomètre FB 2RE: Change Is Round

Who Was Ferdinand Berthoud And Why Should We Care?

Mechanical Exception: Bovet Récital 26 Brainstorm Chapter 2

JM: I’m torn on this classification as the Récital 26 Brainstorm Chapter 2 is a mind blowing watch. I cherished it when it came out, yet it additionally isn’t, at any rate in my brain, as various and excellent compared to its archetypes as different watches in this class. Out of the six watches, five were, by most definitions, sort of noteworthy for what they were.

Brainstorm Chapter 2 was astonishing at this point was unquestionably an adjustment of things Bovet had done in different pieces, taking a touch of the edge off. The wide range of various passages could guarantee world records or world firsts, so I do feel that this was a missed classification in my psyche. Fortunately one of the pieces proceeded to win the Aiguille d’Or so at any rate one was recognized.

Bovet Récital 26 Brainstorm Chapter Two

GG: Did the Bovet profit by the Piaget being lifted to the Aiguille d’Or? We’ll won’t ever know. However, having taken care of the Bovet, I can say that it’s an amazing piece of kit.

IS: While I didn’t pick the Bovet Brainstorm Chapter 2, I composed that, “It is outstanding amongst other looking watches here and I would not be at all shocked in the event that it was a top choice for some.” Another merited winner.

MG: Another merited success for Bovet regardless of incredibly, hefty competition. This nearly felt like one class where the jury couldn’t pick wrong. The Jacob & Co and Ressence may have been more reformist options, yet I feel that in the end the jury may have recently counted up the quantity of complications. Furthermore, that is the place where you were unable to beat the Bovet, which additionally has a sapphire gem case and amazingly very much completed parts.

See how everybody did with their forecasts in Our Predictions In The Mechanical Exception Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Exceptional Circumstances Split Down The Middle

Further reading: Bovet Récital 26 Brainstorm Chapter Two: It’s Mind Blowing! (Live Photos)

Diver’s Watch: Breitling Superocean Automatic

IS: WTF! While I picked the Ming 18.01 H41 to win here, I can completely comprehend that would have been a left field decision as it is an atypical jump watch. Yet, on the off chance that the jury was searching for a more customary plunge watch, what in the world does the Breitling Superocean Automatic 48 Boutique Edition have over the Grand Seiko, which is more modest/more wearable, has four days’ more extended force hold, and twofold the water resistance?

Breitling Superocean Automatic 48 Boutique Edition

JM: I mean, OK, it is a really extraordinary watch, I can’t say I thought it was the awesome. Be that as it may, in view of how the honors had been going up until this point it truly wasn’t a stun, regardless of whether I oppose this idea. I had this watch in my pack so it wasn’t completely obvious. Yet, particularly since Breitling won the Petite Aiguille I would have calculated the jury would attempt to spread the affection yet I surmise there is no explanation different brands have to win.

GG: The two classes I think least about (Jewelry and Diver’s) went especially against my appraisals, however I don’t think the all-Swiss jury comprised generally of industry insiders was truly going to go for the Ming or the Grand Seiko.

ED: Sadly, Gary, I should agree. Also, as though to make the statement: not one non-Swiss watch was picked among the 19 winners (however, honestly, basically all the watches among the named have some Swiss in them some place, just maybe not in origination or name).

MG: Some may differ with me, however the success for Breitling sounds good to me. On the off chance that you are searching for a tough, useful, clear jumper’s watch to really go plunging with, this Breitling is your watch. I for one lean toward the Grand Seiko, yet albeit the cost isn’t expected to be a thought during casting a ballot, it may have all around impacted a member of the jury or two.

ED: Thank you for bringing that up, Martin. That may clear up certain inquiries for work area or non-divers.

See how everybody did foreseeing this class in Our Predictions In The Divers Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): We Have An Unexpected Favorite

Jewellery: Van Cleef & Arpels Frivole Secrète

IS: I didn’t pick the Van Cleef & Arpels Frivole Secrète however thought it the prettiest of the designated watches. Great call, well-meriting winner.

Van Cleef & Arpels Frivole Secrète (closed)

JM: This is a dazzling watch however feels like it missed the mark for the classification. The absence of stone assortment, cut assortment, complicated settings, and generally stylish just felt like this watch might have fit in the Ladies’ class better. Clearly, the jury differ so I surmise we should settle on a truce. It fits the topic of this year.

GG: It likely could be that the generally talking average looking Van Cleef & Arpels Frivole Secrète was substantially more great face to face than in photos.

ED: It probably been, Gary!

I had additionally gotten down on the way that this watch had the most un-number of gemstones in our unique round table . I would have been exceptionally inquisitive to see this one in the metal on the off chance that it made such an impression!

And discussing impressions: I was somewhat embittered with the Dior in this class in my round table comments, however when the honor came up and the authority video of the watch was appeared on screen it really wound up blowing my mind. In the metal, from what I could see, this is a show-stopper. Yet, the renderings the company submitted are so dead. Furthermore, no place in the submitted depiction text did it say that the wings of the honey bee overwhelming the dial move! How charming that is . . . I might dare to dream Dior submits better data and visual guides from now on. That may well have had a major effect in how the commentary – and perhaps – the democratic went.

MG: I surmise the jury didn’t like gemstones and went for the watch that had the least of them! This class ought to praise gems strategies as a workmanship, and notwithstanding it being a pleasant watch the Van Cleef & Arpels somewhat light in that classification. I actually feel that the Jacob & Co ought to have won for what it’s worth out of this world. Incidentally, I can envision that Jacob is troubled as his image had four selections however not a solitary win. I discover this likewise very astonishing as I would see it its watches were solid competitors in every one of the classifications they took part in.

See what our group anticipated in Our Predictions In The Jewelry Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Our Panelists Are Split For A Winner (Again)

Artistic Crafts: Van Cleef & Arpels Soleil Féerique

JM: Finally! I was stressed I wasn’t going to pick a solitary victor this year, so I was glad to see my decision get perceived. This watch was an extremely fascinating and clear one in the Artistic Crafts class, it stood apart to me for its assortment and it appears to be the jury concurred. Perhaps they can’t be all bad.

Van Cleef & Arpels Lady Arpels Soleil Féerique

ED: One of my two right picks too, Joshua! Whoo hoo!

IS: The Van Cleef & Arpels Soleil Féerique was my next in line pick for best Artistic Crafts, so again a decent call from the jury in my opinion.

MG: A classification with a ton of commendable pieces in it, and the Van Cleef & Arpels is assuredly one of them. I imagine that the blended techniques approach was maybe the clincher.

See the group’s gauges in Our Predictions In The Artistic Crafts Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): 6 Watches, 5 Panelists, And 3 Picks For Winner

Petite Aiguille: Breitling Superocean Heritage ’57 Limited Edition II

ED: I’d prefer to say WTF for this class, yet I do locate this decision to not be so out of sight the ballpark, particularly for an all-Swiss jury whose eyes may (shockingly) bypass Austrian or Finnish watches altogether too rapidly. This is actually my number one Breitling to come out this year, so I comprehend if individuals are taken with it. I thought the Habring2 Chrono-Felix Panda was the greatest value for the money in this classification, however, which was made to be explicitly about price.

Breitling Superocean Heritage ’57 Limited Edition II

GG: The Sarpeneva x Moomin that I picked may have been excessively odd for the jury. Also, regardless the triumphant Breitling Superocean Heritage’57 Limited Edition II is both a brilliant watch and made by a major Swiss producer as opposed to a Finnish craftsman, so its triumph shouldn’t come as any surprise.

JM: Besides the way that it didn’t make at any point make my best three, I had moral second thoughts about this watch too, which I communicated in the Petite Aiguille round table . It’s an extraordinary watch however like with the Challenge class , I unquestionably felt there were numerous better alternatives that ought to have presumably dismissed the Superocean Heritage.

IS: While I’m not excited about extravagance watches being showcased as noble motivations either, Joshua, the beautiful Breitling Superocean Heritage ’57 Limited Edition II yells FUN! Any watch that puts a grin all over is a victor for me. While it wasn’t my pick, I anticipated that it should be a solid competitor and can comprehend its appeal to the jury.

MG: I don’t comprehend this decision. Maybe free bunches of Skittles were given to the jury prior to settling on their decisions so they could “taste the rainbow”? The Breitling is unquestionably fun, however the Sarpaneva is more enjoyable. I just don’t get that. The Trilobe is more offbeat, as well, and if a hearer was searching only for horological characteristics I don’t see how the person in question could leave behind the Habring2 Chrono-Felix Panda.

See how we did speculating what direction the jury would go in Our Predictions In The Petite Aiguille Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Comic Figures, Legibility Issues, Skeletonization, And An In-House Monopusher

Further reading: Breitling Vintage-Inspired AVI Ref. 765 1953 Re-Edition, Superocean Heritage ’57 Limited Edition II, and Chronomat B01 42 Bentley: Do They Hit The Mark?

Challenge: Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight

IS: The Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight was my second place pick for best Challenge watch, and I think it the best assigned watch in the class so I’m completely behind the jury’s decision here. I checked it down on the grounds that I felt that as the Black Bay Bronze (and Black Bay Chrono) had just won the Petite Aiguille prize in 2016, and the Black Bay P01 won the Challenge prize in 2019, that enough was sufficient. Notwithstanding, that was somewhat unjustifiable as the Black Bay Fifty-Eight is an alternate watch with a more wearable case width of 39 mm compared to 42 mm of the other Tudor laureates, so again I think the jury settled on a decent decision here.

Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight

MG: Maybe they should now rename this classification the “Dark Bay prize”! Simply a year ago the Black Bay P01 won. Once more, an extremely traditionalist decision by the jury that I experience difficulty understanding. While an incredible watch, it is a bread-and-butter-watch. Among the competition, there were many more extraordinary treats that I think ought to have won.

GG: Somewhere in the GPHG ordinances it should state, “Tudor should win a prize each year”!

IS: Gary, I’d change that to, “Kari Voutilainen and Tudor should win a prize each year.”

JM: Pfft. If it’s not too much trouble. Explore new territory. However, I surmise in the event that you keep on winning prizes for something very similar, after a seemingly endless amount of time after year, why change. No requirement for imagination, simply make one great watch and afterward coast for 10 years. I surmise since Rolex doesn’t enter, the business actually needs to figure out how to indulge the lord. It is a very decent watch, however it’s done, it’s lifeless, how about we proceed onward. I can’t envision deciding in favor of the Black Bay again when you have new and energizing alternatives. This is a classification where I in a real sense need to tell the whole jury that they need to remove their blinders and get with the occasions. The Black Bay shouldn’t win each darn year, it isn’t so much that awesome.

See how everybody did with their expectations in Our Predictions In The Challenge Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Very Interesting Finalists With (Relatively) Affordable Pricing

Horological Revelation: Petermann Bédat Dead Beat Second

IS: I’ve no hamburger with the jury here. While I anticipated the Petermann Bédat Dead Beat Second to win (I considered it a tie) the Men’s class, I likewise believed that in the event that it was ignored there, it is difficult to beat for the Horological Revelation prize .

Petermann Bédat Seconde Morte

JM: I was uncertain that this watch would or could win in the Men’s classification, yet I full no doubt understood it was another fabulous piece from a shiny new brand led by two gifted, youthful watchmakers. It’s incredible to see it regarded, and with an open class like the Horological Revelation, this might have gone to numerous different pieces also (an extraordinary gathering of watches by youthful brands this year in general). This ought to be an extraordinary lift for the youngster brand as it grows.

GG: I was very cheerful about the Petermann Bédat Revelation Prize win, particularly as Florian Bédat was adequately thoughtful to give me a whoop from the stage during his triumph discourse for my (unfathomably) little job in responding to their unique plan and my steady comments on their watch over the previous months. Much obliged, folks, and I’m anticipating where you go from here!

ED: Nice decision! I anticipate becoming acquainted with this youthful brand better.

MG: Very merited win by Petermann Bédat. I felt that this piece entered in some unacceptable classification (a believed that I had with different watches this year, however) yet I am enchanted to see that some honor was presented to it as they unquestionably merited a few. It is a promising brand, and I am interested to take in what will be next from them.

Further perusing: Petermann Bédat Seconde Morte: Dead Seconds, Independently (Video)

Innovation Prize: Parmigiani Hijri Perpetual Calendar

GG: An especially merited success in my view with its Agenhor-created movement.

Parmigiani Fleurier Hijiri Perpetual Calendar

JM: The Hijri Perpetual Calendar is an accomplishment of horology, so to claim the development reward bodes well. There were at any rate about six different pieces that might have effectively accepted the prize too dependent on their own unfathomable advancements, so this exhibits how magnificent the variable Hijri schedule is as a designing problem.

IS: While I didn’t believe that the Parmigiani Fleurier Hijri Perpetual Calendar was a solid competitor for the Innovation prize, GaryG did as such there more likely than not been something there that he saw and I either missed or dismissed.

MG: how the choices are made in regards to the optional prizes are still somewhat hazy to me. All things considered, the Parmigiani is well-meriting the Innovation prize as it certainly brings something new and energizing to the table. To me this watch is somewhat similar to the tide-pointers from Corum, I have positively no requirement for them, yet discover them so cool!

ED: It is a discretionary prize talked about and settled on in the jury room, Martin. It might possibly be given out. What’s more, the interaction is actually equivalent to for the Aiguille d’Or. No genuine secret. Great call this year, incidentally, I like this decision, however I do feel that the Ressence Type 2A would have likewise fit well here.

I should likewise make reference to the discourse given by Parmigiani CEO Davide Traxler, who most importantly said thanks to independent creator and expert Stefano Macaluso – child of the expired Gino Macaluso, past proprietor of Girard-Perregaux – “who was behind the bridges.”

I was likewise agreeably shocked by another piece of Traxler’s discourse, which (deciphered for me by Parmigiani) peruses like this:

“At Parmigiani Fleurier we remain steadfast in our confidence in fortitude, in the force of community, in being motivated by crafted by greats who have come before us, in moving people in the future, and sharing the endowments of watchmaking with industry associates and those around the planet who appreciate the masterfulness of our work. The worldwide community of watch admirers and enthusiasts is a diverse of societies and customs; we commend this variety in our own particular manner with the Hijri Perpetual Calendar, and we trust that – as an industry and as residents of the world – we will likewise accept it in individuals we decide to address and lead us.”

He didn’t utter a word political, yet he surely gave us a reasonable and cheerful demeanor that I much appreciated.

Audacity Prize: H. Moser & Cie x MB&F Endeavor Cylindrical Tourbillon

IS: The H. Moser & Cie x MB&F Endeavor Cylindrical Tourbillon was gone into the Chronometry class , where I believed that it was the most attractive watch however not the best chronometry watch. I love it, however in what equal universe can a jury think it more nervy than the MB&F HM10 Bulldog or Jacob & Co Bugatti Chiron Tourbillon ?

H. Moser & Cie x MB&F Endeavor Cylindrical Tourbillon

MG: While I especially like what Moser and MB&F did, to say that it is the best watch including a non-conventionalist, strange way to deal with watchmaking may be an extension excessively far. Or then again to be more explicit, I accept different watches improve. Essentially, this watch is a DNA-blend of Moser and MB&F, which is the thing that MB&F does constantly. As I would like to think, the E-Crown from the Ressence Type 2A fits this profile marginally better.

ED: I needed to make reference to something very similar, Martin! All things considered, I am satisfied for the acknowledgment for these two autonomous brands who boldly teamed up and delivered this watch at the tallness of the primary COVID-19 wave.

GG: I would have liked to see the Sarpaneva x Moomin for Audacity – yet the last is a nebulous enough classification that the triumphant H. Moser x MB&F appears to be a serious reasonable decision (and is likewise an excellent watch).

JM: Audacity could mean such countless things to various individuals, so this is consistently a hard classification to realize what’s in store. Since it is additionally an open class, the jury could characterize exactly the thing they are searching for yet we won’t ever know, so I am continually astonished to perceive what they esteemed in passing judgment on this classification. The Endeavor Cylindrical Tourbillon H. Moser x MB&F is a wonderful and excellent watch and I have no motivation to question it merits recognition.

In a weird way, however, I simply envision MB&F rooting for H. Moser (since they were actually half winners with Moser) and gradually understanding that they made a comparable watch, one with a world record in it, but then went unrecognized. This resembles that off-kilter second in a gathering when you share a thought and no one says anything, and the individual you concocted the thought with specifies it again later, just marginally unique, and everyone out of nowhere says “Goodness, extraordinary thought, Brad!” And you are left staying there realizing that your thought got picked, however Brad got the acknowledgment, and that feeling simply hits different.

Further reading: Hands On & Live Photos: MB&F x H. Moser LM101 And H. Moser x MB&F Endeavor Cylindrical Tourbillon

Special Jury Prize: Antoine Simonin

ED: This prize was most likely bound to happen as of now. Indeed, a year ago when Gary and I were on the jury still the subject of naming him came up once more, yet to a large portion of us it truly appeared as though Luc Pettavino’s year for Only Watch – and normally it would have additionally been off-kilter to name somebody from inside the jury’s own positions. So I’m not actually 100% astounded about this unfathomably merited honor coming to pass in 2020 since Antoine is presently don’t part of the jury. Indeed, I’m delighted that individuals from the jury who may have been getting back from past years recollected those conversations and thought to follow up on them this year.

Antoine Simonin, victor of the Jury Special prize, on record at the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève

GG: The Special Jury Prize to Antoine Simonin was another in a line of incredible decisions for this honor in the course of recent years. Having served on the jury with him in 2018 and 2019 gave me simply a brief look at the profundity of his insight and astuteness, and as consistently jury boss Aurel Bacs worked really hard of making the introduction both stupendous and personal.

ED: I am so infatuated with the manner in which Aurel presents the Special Jury Prize, Gary! Such a lot of style, panache, and energy! Regardless of whether a couple of the jokes figured out how to appear to crash and burn on the grounds that Aurel appropriately gave him the respect in English and I presume whoever was working the giggle button didn’t comprehend. I worshiped the exceptionally close to home story of how they met. This was my #1 prize given that evening. I love to see genuine pioneers in our field regarded in this way.

JM: The Special Jury Prize is one of those where they are more right than wrong to respect industry individuals who have left an enduring effect across the business overall, and deciding by the accounts shared about Antoine Simonin, he certainly merits acknowledgment for a long period of work committed to horology.

IS: Great acknowledgment for Antoine Simonin, who has contributed a mind blowing sum over his lifetime in the help of fine watchmaking.

Further reading:  Dr. Rebecca Struthers has composed a little commentary on Antoine Simonin , which is certainly justified regardless of a brisk read .

Aiguille d’Or: Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept

JM: I was amazed that this watch that won the Aiguille d’Or, not on the grounds that it isn’t meriting (I brought up that I thought it was truly outstanding of the year in my expectations), but since it sort of thinks outside the box of the more conventional or moderate Aiguille d’Or winners. It is a behemoth while being just 2 mm thick. Accomplishing a world record for slenderness is troublesome, and I am genuinely sure that this one may represent some time just in light of the fact that it is something troublesome to do while being a specialty market section. The vast majority don’t need slender mechanical watches since they need to feel the association with the machine, and a machine ought to have heave or in any event, meaningful presence.

Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept

But the measure of designing that went into this piece required acknowledgment and I am so upbeat it discovered some with the Aiguille d’Or. Two years prior most didn’t really accept that the watch could at any point come around after the first idea watch, yet taking it to creation was, in my brain, what probably took care of business for this watch becoming the watch of the year for the GPHG.

IS: I have offer my appreciation to Martin Green for calling this accurately as while I suspected the Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept had a shot at the Innovation prize, I was unable to see it beating either the Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1 or the Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE . This may well have been a watch that looked substantially more amazing in the metal, and keeping in mind that not my pick for the Aiguille d’Or it is a fantastic watch and commendable winner.

MG: Last year, in 2019, when the super meager Bulgari Octo Finissimo Chronograph GMT brought home the prize in the Chronograph classification while the Aiguille d’Or went to the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Self-Winding Perpetual Calendar Ultra-Thin, I referenced that the ball was currently in Piaget’s court to come with an appropriate reaction, and did the brand at any point do exactly that! A very merited success with the Altiplano Ultimate Concept!

ED: I need to say that it was truly ideal to see some female energy on the stage to acknowledge the Aiguille d’Or! Everything being equal, this was a first; CEO Chabi Nouri thought to express exceptionally binding together words out to the entire business and in a particularly passionate manner. It was a breath of new of air, finishing with, “How about we all continue dreaming, making, and moving for our industry.” Bravo!

See our expectations for this classification in Our Predictions For The Aiguille d’Or (Grand Prize) Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): And We Think It’s Down To Two Watches (Or Possibly Three)

Further reading:

Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept, The World’s Thinnest Watch: Shaving Microns To Make Millionths

Top 10 Thinnest Mechanical Wristwatches: 8 Modern Record Holders And Their 2 Historic Rivals

Quick Facts Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept

Case: 41 x 2 mm, cobalt compound, sapphire precious stone 0.2 mm in stature, level adjustable crown

Development: super slender manual-wind Caliber 900P-UC, 28,800 vph/4 Hz recurrence, 40-hour power hold

Capacities: hours, minutes

Constraint: 3 every year, by uncommon request just, just accessible through Piaget stores

Cost: 410,000 Swiss francs

Video features of the 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève

GG: So much for 2020! I’m anticipating the 2021 adaptation of the GPHG with the expectation that we will have a re-visitation of the customary progression of new watches, that more producers will decide to enter their pieces, that we will see a re-visitation of a degree of general wellbeing that considers the jury to by and by take on an assorted worldwide composition – and that we all will have the chance to see and contact these miracles and examine them with companions in person!Highlights of the

So, how could we do with our predictions?

IS: All in all, I was not fruitful with my expectations. I called three effectively: Petermann Bédat Dead Beat Second (Horological Revelation), Chronométrie Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE.2 (Chronometry), and H. Moser & Cie Streamliner Flyback Chronograph Automatic (Chronograph). Also, three of my next in line picks won: Bovet 1822 Miss Audrey (Ladies), Van Cleef & Arpels Soleil Féerique (Artistic Crafts), and Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight (Challenge).

ED: For somebody who’s really been on that jury multiple times (2012-2019), I wound up with a pathetic equilibrium of just two right forecasts in Artistic Crafts and Chronometry. Be that as it may, the equivalent goes for Gary, who was on the jury twice (2018-2019).

I’m going to put that down to the much-developed nature of the enormous, new Academy and the more modest all-Swiss atomic jury. There was presumably no genuine method to foresee what might occur here – similar as the year 2020 altogether.

Our right predictions

Congratulations to Joshua and Martin with three right expectations in the customary classifications each – specifically Martin, who accurately called the night’s amazing prize!

Joshua Munchow

Calendar and Astronomy: Vacheron Constantin Overseas QP Ultra Thin Skeleton

Chronograph: H. Moser & Cie Streamliner Flyback Automatic Chronograph

Creative Crafts: Van Cleef & Arpels Soleil Féerique

Ian Skellern

Chronograph: H. Moser & Cie Streamliner Flyback Automatic Chronograph

Chronometry: Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE

Martin Green

Chronograph: H. Moser & Cie Streamliner Flyback Automatic Chronograph

Chronometry: Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE

Aiguille d’Or: Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept

GaryG

Men’s Complication: Greubel Forsey Hand Made 1

Chronometry: Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE

Elizabeth Doerr

Artistic Crafts: Van Cleef & Arpels Soleil Féerique

Chronometry: Ferdinand Berthoud FB 2RE

You may likewise enjoy:

The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG) Jury Has Been Chosen: Commentary On The Judges Making The Choices For The Best Watches Of The Year

Our Predictions In The Petite Aiguille Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Comic Figures, Legibility Issues, Skeletonization, And An In-House Monopusher

Our Predictions In The Challenge Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Very Interesting Finalists With (Relatively) Affordable Pricing

Our Predictions For The Aiguille d’Or (Grand Prize) Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): And We Think It’s Down To Two Watches (Or Possibly Three)

Our Predictions In The Artistic Crafts Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): 6 Watches, 5 Panelists, And 3 Picks For Winner

Our Predictions In The Ladies Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): A Sprinkling Of Jewels, A Mismatched Date, And The Ever-Raging Debate On Quartz

Our Predictions In The Calendar And Astronomy Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): We See A Good Moon A-Rising

Our Predictions In The Iconic Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Another Head-Scratcher For Our Panelists But There’s A Clear Favorite

Our Predictions In The Men’s Complication Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Is A Tourbillon A Complication? Part Deux

Our Predictions In The Men’s Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): All 6 Are Potential Winners But Our Panelists Ruthlessly Whittle Them Down

Our Predictions In The Ladies Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): A Sprinkling Of Jewels, A Mismatched Date, And The Ever-Raging Debate On Quartz

Our Predictions In The Jewelry Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Our Panelists Are Split For A Winner (Again)

Our Predictions In The Divers Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): We Have An Unexpected Favorite

Our Predictions In The Chronograph Category Of The 2020 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG): Limited Editions Rule The Roost